Chapter 7 introduces us to theosis:
Early Christians were taught they could grow to be like
Jesus – fully human, but filled with his Spirit’s power, a power that nothing
could destroy. Instead of seeing them as
weak and powerless (the empire’s view of them), the church was offering them the
power of divinity.
The charioteer
Church in Ishan,
Turkey – 10th c.
Early Christians closely connected the sun with the
Son. The weekly Lord’s Day and Easter
were the days of the sun and resurrection; the Gospel of John and early church
sources associated Jesus with divine light. When they saw this fresco of a charioteer (at the lower edge
of the apse) in a church in Turkey, Brock and Parker concluded that he
was mostly likely a Christian saint, completing his theosis, his divinization. As Ephrem the Syrian wrote –
The saints have
ascended to the firmament and opened it,
one of them cleft the
air with his chariot;
the Watchers rejoiced
as they met him.
Theosis: growing into the image of God
The idea of human divinity was pervasive in early
Christianity. The concept of
theosis (that is, to become
like God, to take on the divine nature) captures how the Holy Spirit helps
people dwell in paradise.
Within a generation of Jesus’ death, Christians were being
taught that they gained the same powers of divinity as Jesus Christ through
their baptism.
Theosis was not just for the individual; it was a group process. The earliest
Christian church attracted slaves, peasants, women, the disaffected, and other
very ordinary people. These people
joined communities which enabled them to become ‘partakers in divinity,’ and
gave them a status greater than that of those who exploited them. Thus theosis was a collective activity of the
whole community, embodied in love – which is not just an individual achievement
but a social reality.
Ephrem described theosis as teamwork, like climbing a
mountain together:
The clouds, their chariots fly through the air;
each of them has become the leader of those he has
taught;
his chariot corresponds to his labors,
his glory corresponds to his followers.
Irenaeus taught
that baptism delivered the spiritual power to resist evil, and that the church
was the paradise in which the faithful were nurtured and matured in faith. The power granted through theosis required personal discipline and
community participation to be used ethically and responsibly.
Confession: medicine for sin
Christians understood that theosis could not be fully achieved in this life; though baptism
had washed away all sins, power could be misused – and temptation was pervasive.
Christians could commit virtually
unpardonable sins. Following the Decian
persecutions (249-251), during which many (including bishops) abandoned their
faith, Cyprian declared that ‘divinity had come to the rescue,’ and offered a
way for the benefits of baptism to be renewed: through penance and
confession.
Grave sins required penance because, if unaddressed, they
poisoned networks of love, truth, compassion and justice. Sins broke relationships, and rehabilitation
required penitents to take responsibility for their behavior.
Penance was the medicine that would make them
well enough to return to the Eucharist.
The community guided and corrected its members through prayer and social
pressure; in a world where solidarity with others, shared knowledge and
community life were essential to survival, reliance on the community was the
key to personal strength.
Until the 6th century, public confessions were required for
killing, adultery, and apostasy. From Christianity’s earliest centuries,
leaders taught that Christians could not shed human blood for any reason. Even after Christian principles of ‘just war’
emerged in the 5th century, the church maintained prohibitions against
war. Soldiers were expected to undergo
penance before partaking of the Eucharist.
The church’s moral stand on shedding human blood, while never adequately
lived out, held for a millennium; as late as the Norman invasion of England in
1066, warriors went to monasteries to do penance for killing.
Equality in paradise?
But when it came to women, many men clung to the social
attitudes of their time, rather than accepting the full implications of theosis.
The pater familias was the fundamental building block of Roman control; Roman culture imposed a hierarchical family structure, with
women subservient to men.
As elite males entered Christian life, they incorporated the
classic Roman virtues into theosis.
These classic virtues – (from the
Latin vir, man) defined manliness
through the ideas of courage, control, and dispassion, and they were often
mixed with Greek ideas of the power of masculine nous (mind) over feminine aesthesis
(senses). Just as men were to
dominate women, the virtues were to rule over the passions.
Baptism could cleanse the soul of polluting passions, opening
a person to the spirit of discipline and the control of feeling and desire.
Jerome pictured the ideal man as one who regulated his body ‘as a charioteer
does his pace.’ The body was a chariot,
and the mind the charioteer.
Virtuous women were also to control their emotions, desires
and bodies. They were also to display the
manly virtues of courage, fortitude, temperance, and justice, and eschew the
passions. (Nonetheless, they were to submit to men.)
After Constantine approved Christianity, more and more elite men joined the
church. New virtues – to guarantee men’s submission to church authority – were
added to the list of traditional manly virtues.
Now men were to were to keep their manly virtues, but also take on the
traditional feminine qualities of submission and humility in relation to God. (These
new virtues had previously been assigned to women, to lower-status men, and to
slaves.)
St. Augustine was among the ‘new males’ who incorporated
previously feminine virtues into their ideas of sanctified humanity. His struggles with his passions led him to
conclude that virtue could not be achieved through force of will. This required
the grace of the Holy Spirit – and the grace of a sanctified and sanctifying
community.
Augustine’s understanding of Christian spirituality
eventually embraced the passions, because passionate desires can lead the soul
to God. But still, his affirmation of the
passions – associated with the feminine – did not lead Augustine to regard
women as the equals of men.
But contemporary scholarship has demonstrated that some
Christian communities did promote equal relationships. Ephrem, in the eastern tradition, respected
the spiritual power of women and lauded their courage and boldness. And women themselves did not simply accept
their insubordination....
Please continue reading
on the next post,
Theosis and women


No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome as part of our ongoing conversation! (To post your comment, choose "Anonymous" when offered a choice and if you like, add your name at the end.)